When the Jimmo v Sebelius settlement was announced in 2013, patient advocates applauded what they saw as a landmark change for individuals who need care to maintain their medical conditions or slow their declining health. However, 3 years later, many providers and payment adjudicators are still making coverage decisions as if they’re living in a pre-Jimmo world—mostly because the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) hasn’t done enough to bring them up to speed, according to an advocacy group supported by APTA.
Recently, APTA provided a supporting declaration to the Center for Medicare Advocacy’s (CMA) efforts to get CMS to do a better job of making it clear that the “Improvement Standard”—the idea that Medicare coverage can only be extended if that care will actually improve the patient’s condition—is a fallacy, and that skilled maintenance care can qualify for payment.
“There are still many providers and contractors who do not know about, understand, or trust the change in the improvement policy,” CMA wrote in a December 2015 letter to APTA and other stakeholders. “We believe this is largely due to the fact that CMS’ Education Campaign was insufficient to make up for the rigor with which Medicare enforced the Improvement Standard—for decades.” According to CMA, CMS conducted only 1 briefing for providers and adjudicators, in early December of 2013. Since that time, CMS “has refused to do more,” CMA writes.
Full story of the Jimmo message at APTA